Aivars Ozoliņš: Sastrēgums Kosovā

tad paskaties ANO zinjojumus par beegljiem - beeglji paraadiijaas ceturtajaa bombardeeshanas dienaa taapat id.kokleem gruuti uztvert Rambuljee dokumenta noziimi - traucee ideologjiskais filtrs galvaa - uztveru tikai lozungus/ soundbite

varbuut dereetu piestraadaat pie mafiozaa anklaava imidza??? KOSOVAS VALSTS??? orgaanu nolaupiitaaji,narkodileeri un slaisti.. Un serbiem shi meeslu bedre buutu jaasauc par valsti??

Skaidrs, ka "Maskava" turpinās muķīt ūdeņus. Duļķainā ūdenī taču vieglāk ķert zivtiņas.

Bija jābombardē, jo Miloševičs saprata tikai spēka valodu.

Tu murgo, bombardēt sāka, jo Milošecs atteicās apturēt etnisko tīrīšanu Kosovā, sākumā bija bēgļi, pēc tam bombardēšana, nevis otrādi. Bez tam pirms uzlidojuma brīdināja, ko bombardēs, lai būtu mazāk upuri.

rambuljee "diplomaatiju" kas bija kara pieteikshanas dekleraacija Dienvidslaavijai organizeeja madleena olbraita, un kas notiek vinjas galvinjaa un kaadas veertiibas vinju iedvesmo var redzeet shai iisajaa videoklipaa: madeleine albright on 60 minutes - "worth it" www.youtube.com/watch?v=lK_QshS2EW8 60 Minutes, CBS News, May 12, 1996: Lesley Stahl [on US sanctions against Iraq]: "We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?" Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it." "Cool War: Economic sanctions as a weapon of mass destruction" By Joy Gordon /www.scn.org/ccpi/HarpersJoyGordonNov02.html John and Karl Mueller, "Sanctions of Mass Destruction," Foreign Affairs, Clinton's "sanctions of mass destruction" caused "the deaths of more people in Iraq than have been slain by all so-called weapons of mass destruction [nuclear and chemical] throughout all history" "The Secret Behind the Sanctions: How the U.S. Intentionally Destroyed Iraq's Water Supply" By Thomas J. Nagy www.progressive.org/0801issue/nagy0901.html

par Rambuljee "diplomaatiju" kuru vadiija Olbraita un Holbruks: taa saucamaa diplomaatija Rambuljee 1999.g. februaarii izvirziija ultimaatu serbijai - lai taa ir mieraa ar serbijas faktisku okupaaciju NATO paskataa un NATO nedriikst tikt nekaadaa zinjaa trauceeti, jaanodod riiciibaa visi resursi ko NATO uzskata par vajadziigu etc serbija bija ar mieru kosovaa izvietot ANO karaspeeku un lai garantee visu minoritaashu tiesiibas ... bet masu meediji atkal vareeja puust stabulee par serbu demoniem kas chakaree Rietumus un njirgaajas par "briivo pasauli" un kad saakaas tie beeglju pluudi?? PEEC Nato bombardeeshanas kampanjas saakshanaas nevis bombardeeshana tika saakta taapeec ka luuk beeglji , nevajag tik bezkauniigi melot un sagroziit faktus , ok? un 46% albaanju pameta kosovu un 60% serbu un melnkalnieshu kas veelaak neatgriezaas kosovaa un beega 1)no bombardeeshanas 2)no kaujas vietaam starp serbiem un KLA 3) visi(!) beega nevis tikai albaanji ,ok un bombardeeshanas laikaa serbijaa tika nogalinaati triis nedeeljaas vairaak civilo nekaa triis meeneshos kosovaa un tas skaitot abaas pusees(kas it kaa bija iemesls bombardeeshanas saakshanai) un peec bombardeeshanas kosovaa atrada cik kjemenjus??? ap 3 000 - un vinju naaves ceelonis bija no dazhaadiem iemesliem un nevareeja pateikt vai tas serbs albaanis vai kaads cits , bet kaa atceramies ASV breeca par 500 000 nogalinaatajiem jeb ierastaa plate par serbu deemoniem kas mieraa dziivot negrib kas murgo par lielserbiju etc etc un kas notika kad bombardeeshana beidzaas? 1000 - 2000 nogalinaato, 150 000 serbu + 90 000 chigaanu tika padziiti, maajas nodedzinaatas un tas viss KFOR karaspeeka acu priekshaa!!! un zviedrs kas pret to protesteeja tika iemests chokaa, taa luuk un interesanti ka pashaa Serbijaa nenotika etniskaas tiiriishanas - ne horvaatu, ne musulmanju ne albaanju bet ideologjiskajiem kokleetaajiem ir sava dienaskaartiiba kurai maz sakara ar realitaati (toties jo liela ar izpatikshanu varas piramiidaam ASV) rambuljee ultimaats serbijai ko deeveeja par "diplomaatiju" bet kas iisteniibaa bija serbijas okupaacijas akcepteeshana www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/apr/28/balkans 12 APPENDIX B Appendix B, the "Status of the Multi-National Military Implementation Force," includes extraordinarily intrusive provisions for Yugoslavia as a whole. Section 6a. "NATO shall be immune from all legal process, whether civil, administrative, or criminal." Section 6b. "NATO personnel, under all circumstances and at all times, shall be immune from the Parties, jurisdiction in respect of any civil, administrative, criminal or disciplinary offenses which may be committed by them in the FRY (Federal Republic of Yugoslavia)." Section 7. "NATO personnel shall be immune from any form of arrest, investigation, or detention by the authorities in the FRY." Together, Sections 6 and 7 comprise the old, hated, colonial concept of "extraterritoriality," under which the colonizers were immune from being tried by the courts of the colonized country, even if they committed -- as they often did -- rape, murder and mayhem. Section 8: "NATO personnel shall enjoy, together with their vehicles, vessels, aircraft, and equipment, free and unrestricted passage and unimpeded access throughout the FRY including associated airspace and territorial waters. This shall include, but not be limited to, the right of bivouac, maneuver, billet and utilization of any areas or facilities as required for support, training, and operations." Section 11: "NATO is granted the use of airports, roads, rails, and ports without payment of fees, duties, dues, tolls, or charges occasioned by mere use." Section 15: "The Parties (Yugoslav & Kosovo governments) shall, upon simple request, grant all telecommunications services, including broadcast services, needed for the Operation, as determined by NATO. This shall include the right to utilize such means and services as required to assure full ability to communicate and the right to use all of the electromagnetic spectrum for this purpose, free of cost."

No visām pusēm tas nebija gudri darīts, tikpat labi var atdalīt Rīgu vai daugavpili.

No vienas puses, Kosovas albāņu un serbu kopdzīve iespējama nav, no otras puses - neatkarības atzīšana ir ļoti slikts precedents, jo pārkāptas visas starptautiskās normas, un rietumi ar to, faktiski, turpina Buša iesākto starptautisko tiesību graušanu, kas nākotnē var ļoti atspēlēties, kad rietumiem būs jāapelē pie šim tiesībām citos gadījumos. Bez tam Kosova absolūti krimināls anklāvs, bez jebkādas ekonomikas. Domāju, rietumiem vajadzēja uzstāt uz formālu Kosovas palikšanu Serbijas sastāvā, bet praktisku piln;īgu neatkarību, ja ASV gribētu, viņa albāņus uz to varētu piespiest, jo serbi bija ar mieru uz tādu variantu.