Vicepremjers: Daļa miliču Doņeckā pārgājusi separātistu pusē

Arāja brigādi?

ziņo ka bruņutransportieri nonākuši " teroristu" rokās.

New York Times, kas ir pasaulē ar Pulicera prēmijām visvairāk apbalvotā avīze (otrā vietā esošā The Washington Post ir tālu iepakaļus) un kuras starptautiskais izdevums līdz nesenam laikam bija pazīstams kā International Herald Tribune, savos ziņu rakstos rada dīvainu noskaņu. Piem., lasītāju visiecienītākais komentārs apšaubam Kijevas valdības leģitimitāti un popularitāti. GePap New York, New York 2 hours ago I am a bit confused - how would the defection of soldiers be an "escalation" by militants? Is the reporter claiming that soldiers were forced to defect? No evidence of that is given. A defection by local forces does say much about the state of readiness and the morale of Ukrainian forces in the East, but we are to blame pro-Russia militants for that as well? Is the government in Kiev utterly blameless for everything? Wow, was a sad sack regime that is.... NYT redakcijas izvēlētais komentārs ir par to pašu. J. Lopez USA 40 minutes ago The interim "rulers" in Kiev have no constitutional legitimacy and are incompetent. They gained power through mob rule, ignoring an EU-brokered agreement that they agreed to and that would have paved the way for elections this year. These "gentlemen" add fuel to the fire through incendiary rhetoric, ignoring the legitimate concerns of the Russian speaking population. One hopes that diplomacy wins out in the end. Major economic and other technical support from the US, EU and IMF to an illegitimate government is misguided and may prove counterproductive to a sustainable solution. Arī no Latvijas puses ir pamatīga propaganda un vienpusīgas ziņas. Rietumiem Kijevā notikušais apvērsums ir ļoti neērts un Rietumu sabiedrība diezin vai būs gatava militāri aizstāvēt valdību, kura nav ievēlēta vēlēšanās.